Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 148

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $418,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
2021
1Carter Plantation LimitedRolling Fork, MS 39159$76,966
2Trustmark National Bank **Greenwood, MS 38935$53,489
3First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$46,246
4Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$21,299
5The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$16,789
6Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$13,476
7Denon's Flying Service IncRolling Fork, MS 39159$12,414
8Fullen Ag CompanyRipley, TN 38063$11,663
9BankplusBelzoni, MS 39038$10,676
10Pemble Farms Partnership IIMerigold, MS 38759$10,067
11David S WansleyVicksburg, MS 39183$8,031
12C T DannaRosedale, MS 38769$7,884
13Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$6,870
14Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$6,303
15Centennial Bank **Cabot, AR 72023$5,272
16Unruh FarmsClarksdale, MS 38614$4,991
17Smyly Planting CoHollandale, MS 38748$4,692
18H & H FarmsLouise, MS 39097$4,340
19Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$4,136
20Warlick Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$3,696

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag