Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 277
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,346,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $94,588 |
2 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $71,250 |
3 | Holly Ridge Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $71,131 |
4 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $69,778 |
5 | Murrell Farms | Avon, MS 38723 | $59,375 |
6 | G T & T Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $59,375 |
7 | Michael E Johnson & Son | Tunica, MS 38676 | $59,375 |
8 | Three M Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $59,375 |
9 | White Farms Ajv | Marks, MS 38646 | $58,778 |
10 | Prewitt Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $58,546 |
11 | , | $58,345 | |
12 | St Rest Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $56,325 |
13 | Arant Farms 2 | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $54,708 |
14 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $50,257 |
15 | Dunn Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $49,920 |
16 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $47,500 |
17 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $47,500 |
18 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $47,500 |
19 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $47,500 |
20 | Garry & Dawn Nipper Ptrs | Chatham, MS 38731 | $47,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>