Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 4th District of Mississippi (Rep. Steven Palazzo), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 330
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Mississippi (Rep. Steven Palazzo) totaled $537,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lester Shaw | Saucier, MS 39574 | $3,422 |
22 | Harold O Hinton | Richton, MS 39476 | $3,399 |
23 | Arthur Roddy Scarbrough | Richton, MS 39476 | $3,379 |
24 | Mitchell Dearman | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $3,350 |
25 | Billy Royce Ladner | Poplarville, MS 39470 | $3,340 |
26 | Henry A Arledge | Saucier, MS 39574 | $3,311 |
27 | Marshall H Havard | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $3,283 |
28 | Preston Wayde Gill | Poplarville, MS 39470 | $3,277 |
29 | Alex Elbert Cuevas | Perkinston, MS 39573 | $3,090 |
30 | Janelle J Gent | Hattiesburg, MS 39401 | $3,080 |
31 | Shelby Wayne Ladner | Perkinston, MS 39573 | $3,076 |
32 | Howard R Jordan Jr | Richton, MS 39476 | $3,072 |
33 | Lawrence D Rounsaville Jr | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $2,972 |
34 | Cary F Gray | Slidell, LA 70461 | $2,958 |
35 | Kathlyn Chickee Knox | Picayune, MS 39466 | $2,953 |
36 | Fred L Stevens | Poplarville, MS 39470 | $2,914 |
37 | Kilfred Walley | Richton, MS 39476 | $2,888 |
38 | James Withers | Baton Rouge, LA 70818 | $2,880 |
39 | John M Allgood | Hurley, MS 39555 | $2,803 |
40 | Michael Dane Smith | Poplarville, MS 39470 | $2,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”