Farm Subsidy information
1st District of North Carolina
(Rep. G.K. Butterfield)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,266
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $62,085,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Double A Farms Partnership | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $221,116 |
42 | Amd Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $220,119 |
43 | Joyner Farms Inc | Aulander, NC 27805 | $219,330 |
44 | Del Ag, Inc | Rich Square, NC 27869 | $217,993 |
45 | Mush Island Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $215,028 |
46 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $214,678 |
47 | Matt Arvis Farms Inc | Colerain, NC 27924 | $213,850 |
48 | Stephenson Bros | Garysburg, NC 27831 | $212,683 |
49 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $208,266 |
50 | Edward E Dail Farms | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $207,169 |
51 | Tim Phelps Farms LLC | Gaston, NC 27832 | $206,331 |
52 | Larry G Whitehurst Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $206,235 |
53 | B & R Norris Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $204,154 |
54 | Albemarle Beach Farms Inc | Edenton, NC 27932 | $204,107 |
55 | Conoho Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $201,558 |
56 | Harris Farms Inc | Roper, NC 27970 | $201,090 |
57 | David E Whitehurst Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $200,614 |
58 | Buckhorn Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $198,901 |
59 | Byrum Farm Service Center Inc | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $198,398 |
60 | Featherstone Farms LLC | Windsor, NC 27983 | $198,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”