Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,756
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $51,734,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $205,043 |
42 | Umphlett Brothers | Gates, NC 27937 | $204,818 |
43 | Conoho Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $201,558 |
44 | Buckhorn Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $198,901 |
45 | B & D Lassiter Farms | Conway, NC 27820 | $187,606 |
46 | Tim Phelps Farms LLC | Gaston, NC 27832 | $187,428 |
47 | Edward E Dail Farms | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $187,194 |
48 | John E Lancaster Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $186,743 |
49 | Williford Farms Inc | Windsor, NC 27983 | $186,425 |
50 | Dennis Trotman | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $186,262 |
51 | B & R Norris Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $185,680 |
52 | Jth Farms | Garysburg, NC 27831 | $183,186 |
53 | Lassiter Brothers Farms | Potecasi, NC 27867 | $182,922 |
54 | Gran Passione Farming | Conway, NC 27820 | $182,389 |
55 | Evans Farms | Nashville, NC 27856 | $180,585 |
56 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $179,130 |
57 | Kl&z Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $178,483 |
58 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $176,571 |
59 | Felton Outland Farming | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $175,840 |
60 | Drewette & Flythe | Jackson, NC 27845 | $174,867 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”