Tobacco Payment Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 13,771
Recipients of Tobacco Payment Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $3,586,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Finley Daniel Bissett | Bakersfield, CA 93308 | $6,082 |
62 | Ted Lee Bissett II | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $6,082 |
63 | Autry Bissette | Middlesex, NC 27557 | $5,991 |
64 | L Wayne Edwards | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $5,983 |
65 | Sheree B Rose | Nashville, NC 27856 | $5,941 |
66 | Richard J Bender | Norlina, NC 27563 | $5,940 |
67 | Mac W Lawrence | Colerain, NC 27924 | $5,931 |
68 | O J Smith Farms Inc | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $5,931 |
69 | Daniels Bros Inc | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $5,920 |
70 | Bobby R Bissette | Middlesex, NC 27557 | $5,904 |
71 | Earl Sullivan | Lucama, NC 27851 | $5,802 |
72 | Roberson Farms LLC | Ocracoke, NC 27960 | $5,770 |
73 | Harold Lawrence Jr | Colerain, NC 27924 | $5,740 |
74 | Melvin G Tetterton | Plymouth, NC 27962 | $5,671 |
75 | James B Morris | Colerain, NC 27924 | $5,665 |
76 | Don C Carson Farms Inc | Bethel, NC 27812 | $5,652 |
77 | Joseph D Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $5,642 |
78 | Pearson Farm No 1928 Part | Wilson, NC 27894 | $5,633 |
79 | Raymond J Seaman | Manson, NC 27553 | $5,595 |
80 | David L Bunting Sr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $5,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”