Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 465
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $587,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Morning Farm LLC | Greensboro, NC 27404 | $2,715 |
62 | Thomas E Davis | Raleigh, NC 27616 | $2,619 |
63 | Skinner Farms Inc | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $2,614 |
64 | Susan Oneal Hill | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $2,600 |
65 | Cary Whitaker Properties LLC | Durham, NC 27707 | $2,584 |
66 | Lottie E Tharrington | Elm City, NC 27822 | $2,565 |
67 | Edward Bryant Oakley | Farmville, NC 27828 | $2,519 |
68 | Martha E Stone | Myrtle Beach, SC 29572 | $2,472 |
69 | Dolores F Journigan | Nashville, NC 27856 | $2,470 |
70 | River Road Partners LLC | Archer Lodge, NC 27527 | $2,460 |
71 | Keith Jordan | Creswell, NC 27928 | $2,433 |
72 | Carey F Carr | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $2,393 |
73 | Steve Taylor | Williamston, NC 27892 | $2,383 |
74 | Elias Farms LLC | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $2,274 |
75 | O N Vaughan | Weldon, NC 27890 | $2,248 |
76 | Samuel Glenn Eason Revocable Trust | Lillington, NC 27546 | $2,236 |
77 | Margaret E Sowerwine | Rocky Mount, NC 27801 | $2,215 |
78 | Patrick G Veltman III | Enfield, NC 27823 | $2,170 |
79 | Bridmar Farms LLC | Rocky Mount, NC 27803 | $2,166 |
80 | David Dwight Batts | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $2,126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”