Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 92
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $742,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stephen E Allen | Pendleton, NC 27862 | $3,687 |
62 | , | $3,090 | |
63 | Jimmie Hathaway | Fountain, NC 27829 | $2,856 |
64 | Srb Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $2,820 |
65 | J Wilson Fleming | Manson, NC 27553 | $2,761 |
66 | Patricia G Proctor | Rocky Mount, NC 27801 | $2,567 |
67 | Shady Oak Farms Inc | Conway, NC 27820 | $2,485 |
68 | W T Newton Farms Inc | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $2,315 |
69 | Russell Austin Davis | Sims, NC 27880 | $2,286 |
70 | Robert Shearin | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,142 |
71 | James C Sykes | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $1,994 |
72 | White Oak Acres LLC | Nashville, NC 27856 | $1,639 |
73 | Casey Webb | Fountain, NC 27829 | $1,620 |
74 | Beasley Brothers Farm LLC | Jackson, NC 27845 | $1,478 |
75 | Elbert Ray Pitt Jr | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $1,368 |
76 | Melissa C Dickens | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $1,278 |
77 | George Taylor Grimes | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $1,254 |
78 | Robert E Pridgen Jr | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $1,222 |
79 | James F Flythe | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $1,155 |
80 | David Scott Smith | Oak City, NC 27857 | $1,050 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”