Cotton Ginning Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 718
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $12,804,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | High Farms Inc | Bailey, NC 27807 | $44,700 |
82 | John R Grimes Jr Farms | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $44,556 |
83 | Laabee Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $44,525 |
84 | Fleming Brothers Farms LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $44,474 |
85 | Drewette & Flythe | Jackson, NC 27845 | $44,422 |
86 | William Bruce Davis | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $44,414 |
87 | Earl White & Son Farms | Murfreesboro, NC 27855 | $44,010 |
88 | Taylor Slade | Williamston, NC 27892 | $43,721 |
89 | Kenneth W Davis | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $43,351 |
90 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $43,270 |
91 | Fhr Farms | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $42,774 |
92 | Elizabeth H Foster | Greenville, NC 27834 | $42,410 |
93 | S Pate Pierce | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $42,209 |
94 | Brent Pierce | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $42,209 |
95 | Rose Farm Joint Venture | Nashville, NC 27856 | $41,730 |
96 | Mush Island Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $41,680 |
97 | Burt T Philips | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $41,194 |
98 | Lynn Hobbs Farms | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $41,007 |
99 | Copeland Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $40,572 |
100 | John G Little | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $40,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”