Farm Subsidy information
1st District of North Carolina
(Rep. G.K. Butterfield)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,006
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $9,488,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | R E H Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $18,705 |
82 | B & R Norris Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $18,484 |
83 | Hoffler Farms | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $18,455 |
84 | Robert E Hyman Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $18,443 |
85 | Haywood E Harrell | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $18,207 |
86 | Fisher Farms Partnership | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $18,076 |
87 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $18,059 |
88 | Rod Howell Farms Inc | Jackson, NC 27845 | $17,256 |
89 | Tnt Farms | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $17,208 |
90 | Dew Farms LLC | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $17,202 |
91 | Harrell Farms Group LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $17,193 |
92 | Perry & Manning Farms Inc | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $17,133 |
93 | George Howard Moore Jr | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $17,032 |
94 | 3l Farming Company LLC | Nashville, NC 27856 | $16,906 |
95 | Palmyra Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $16,885 |
96 | , | $16,538 | |
97 | Larry Strickland | Castalia, NC 27816 | $16,294 |
98 | Derrick E. Bunn | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $16,153 |
99 | , | $16,021 | |
100 | Planters Produce Company LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $15,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”