Loan Deficiency in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,709
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $144,529,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joe Simpson | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $316,415 |
82 | Ronald Boyette | Bethel, NC 27812 | $315,961 |
83 | E J Vick Farming Co LLC | Wilson, NC 27896 | $315,620 |
84 | Zeb Winslow Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $314,916 |
85 | Stalls Farming Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $314,516 |
86 | Mush Island Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $313,977 |
87 | Anderson M Davis | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $312,140 |
88 | Starling Bell Jr | Oak City, NC 27857 | $310,617 |
89 | Nanci W Weinstein | Windsor, NC 27983 | $310,527 |
90 | Edward M Brown III | Oak City, NC 27857 | $309,996 |
91 | Joseph A Suggs | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $308,170 |
92 | Ronnie L Staton Estate | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $305,608 |
93 | J G Shields III | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $305,561 |
94 | Kelly C Martin Jr | Conway, NC 27820 | $302,757 |
95 | Billy Dew | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $298,082 |
96 | Ellis W Taylor | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $297,799 |
97 | Conoho Farms Inc | Oak City, NC 27857 | $295,628 |
98 | Jake Taylor Farms Inc | Bradenton, FL 34203 | $294,396 |
99 | J Wayne Carlisle | Hamilton, NC 27840 | $289,016 |
100 | Benjamin Dew | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $288,095 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”