Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 384

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $4,294,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
81Frank P Philips JrBattleboro, NC 27809$17,124
82Charlie L Armstrong JrWhitakers, NC 27891$16,500
83Oliver S MooreKelford, NC 27847$16,425
84Randal Barnes Farms IncKenly, NC 27542$16,314
85Jeffrey P BenderNorlina, NC 27563$16,200
86J B Riddick JrCorapeake, NC 27926$16,146
87Timothy R Braddy Farms IncHobgood, NC 27843$15,508
88John A FinchSpring Hope, NC 27882$15,327
89James Russell LongSeaboard, NC 27876$15,317
90Kermit Wayne AycockLucama, NC 27851$15,302
91Joe R AyersOak City, NC 27857$15,145
92Robert L Perry JrWilliamston, NC 27892$15,001
93Eddye Mae H RicksCastalia, NC 27816$15,000
94Herman E HughesWindsor, NC 27983$15,000
95Wee Winn LLCRich Square, NC 27869$15,000
96Buckhorn FarmsScotland Neck, NC 27874$14,950
97David BlalockWilson, NC 27893$14,750
98Dalen F HolmesCreswell, NC 27928$14,599
99Rose Farm Joint VentureNashville, NC 27856$14,489
100Greg K BassRed Oak, NC 27868$14,486

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag