Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 465
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $587,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James L Parker | Hickory, NC 28601 | $1,719 |
102 | Michael Robertson | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $1,715 |
103 | William R Horne | Newport, NC 28570 | $1,695 |
104 | Sarah R Griffin | Williamston, NC 27892 | $1,684 |
105 | Dean M Kight | Halifax, NC 27839 | $1,683 |
106 | Robert B Outland III | Rich Square, NC 27869 | $1,680 |
107 | Edward Wright Outland | Clemmons, NC 27012 | $1,680 |
108 | Mary Frances Draper | Durham, NC 27707 | $1,618 |
109 | David Ray Callihan | Farmville, NC 27828 | $1,607 |
110 | Daniel Callihan | Waxhaw, NC 28173 | $1,607 |
111 | Victor S Vannortwick | Williamston, NC 27892 | $1,564 |
112 | Wilda M Goldberg | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $1,532 |
113 | Edgar G Bulluck | Arden, NC 28704 | $1,511 |
114 | Tracy C Qualls III | Hollister, NC 27844 | $1,508 |
115 | , | $1,508 | |
116 | Elizabeth Vanhorn | Creswell, NC 27928 | $1,497 |
117 | Douglas Pickette | Rocky Mount, NC 27803 | $1,490 |
118 | Everett Home Farm LLC | Williamston, NC 27892 | $1,486 |
119 | Roland M Harper | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $1,485 |
120 | George Stokes Jr | Tampa, FL 33610 | $1,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”