Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 384

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $4,294,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
101Tim N BassRed Oak, NC 27868$14,486
102Troy Lee BowenWilliamston, NC 27892$14,414
103Mickey L Bissette SrBailey, NC 27807$14,228
104Lamm FarmsSims, NC 27880$14,205
105Linda B EvansNashville, NC 27856$14,001
106Dickens FarmsLittleton, NC 27850$13,975
107Robert R Bailey EstateBailey, NC 27807$13,900
108Joseph C LeggettWilliamston, NC 27892$13,850
109Stephen W HarperCape Carteret, NC 28584$13,757
110Randy J AycockFremont, NC 27830$13,591
111Jwh Farms IncWilliamston, NC 27892$13,513
112Rock Ridge Farm PartnershipWilson, NC 27893$13,335
113Todd Glover Farms IncWilson, NC 27896$13,188
114Leslie B GardnerElm City, NC 27822$12,927
115Geoffrey H Corey & Son IncWilliamston, NC 27892$12,924
116Joseph Steven Evans SrNashville, NC 27856$12,813
117E L Perry AdmMerry Hill, NC 27957$12,753
118George H JonesNashville, NC 27856$12,676
119Judy P WeltonRoxobel, NC 27872$12,646
120David E Whitehurst IncRobersonville, NC 27871$12,463

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag