Farm Subsidy information
1st District of North Carolina
(Rep. G.K. Butterfield)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,266
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $62,085,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Fields Of Cotton LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $131,137 |
122 | Brinkley Lands LLC | Aulander, NC 27805 | $131,090 |
123 | Charles D Hale | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $130,887 |
124 | Bissette Farms Inc | Middlesex, NC 27557 | $130,336 |
125 | George Taylor Grimes | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $130,017 |
126 | W B Gillam III Dba Gillam Farms | Harrellsville, NC 27942 | $129,636 |
127 | R B Knowles Inc | Windsor, NC 27983 | $128,937 |
128 | Rod Howell Farms Inc | Jackson, NC 27845 | $128,782 |
129 | James Family Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $128,319 |
130 | William R Williamson | Wilson, NC 27895 | $127,943 |
131 | Pierce Leaf Co LLC | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $127,588 |
132 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $127,097 |
133 | Sandy Swamp Farms | Conway, NC 27820 | $126,963 |
134 | Robert C Cooke | Littleton, NC 27850 | $126,010 |
135 | Michael Morris | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $124,208 |
136 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $124,155 |
137 | Gilbert Leggett Farms Inc | Windsor, NC 27983 | $123,268 |
138 | Taylor Slade | Williamston, NC 27892 | $122,890 |
139 | Revelle & Revelle Inc | Conway, NC 27820 | $122,708 |
140 | Maurice Gregory Barnhill | Enfield, NC 27823 | $122,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”