Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 384

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $4,294,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Worley M WarrenRobersonville, NC 27871$12,039
122James A Davis IIIScotland Neck, NC 27874$11,771
123Mark Eugene BuntingOak City, NC 27857$11,726
124James Albert WilliamsRobersonville, NC 27871$11,663
125Bennett Bros PtnRich Square, NC 27869$11,513
126W F Rooker And SonsManson, NC 27553$11,500
127Kelly C Martin JrConway, NC 27820$11,450
128Billy W GreenElm City, NC 27822$11,401
129Barnes Farming CorpSpring Hope, NC 27882$11,382
130Tyner Farms PartnersElm City, NC 27822$11,347
131Michael G PittmanHalifax, NC 27839$11,149
132Ruby HarmonAulander, NC 27805$10,855
133Joseph Steven Evans JrNashville, NC 27856$10,726
134Vernon L Rhodes JrBattleboro, NC 27809$10,695
135Anderson FarmsTarboro, NC 27886$10,501
136Ben Frank TwiddyCreswell, NC 27928$10,500
137Charles T JonesWoodland, NC 27897$10,500
138Livestock Supply Co., Inc.Belhaven, NC 27810$10,500
139Bruce R CallisAhoskie, NC 27910$10,500
140Frederick Lowe ChanceBethel, NC 27812$10,477

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag