Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 384

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $4,294,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
141Timothy W FisherWhitakers, NC 27891$10,411
142Cannon Bros Farms IncOak City, NC 27857$10,400
143James A Davis JrScotland Neck, NC 27874$10,152
144Taylor FarmsNashville, NC 27856$10,067
145Mayhugh M RobersonRobersonville, NC 27871$10,002
146Donnie G RobersonRobersonville, NC 27871$10,000
147Rickie D GrimesWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
148William T PerryJamesville, NC 27846$10,000
149Tice FarmsWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
150W Robert Harris Farms IncRobersonville, NC 27871$10,000
151Paul Harris Farms IncRobersonville, NC 27871$10,000
152Clifford Bennet LilleyWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
153Kevin J PerryJamesville, NC 27846$10,000
154Cynthia C BuntingOak City, NC 27857$10,000
155Larry G Whitehurst IncRobersonville, NC 27871$10,000
156Brownie RobersonWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
157Charlie D HarrisonWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
158Stephen C LilleyWilliamston, NC 27892$10,000
159Joel Slade PeeleOak City, NC 27857$10,000
160Travis S WhitehurstConetoe, NC 27819$10,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag