Total Disaster Programs in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,675

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $242,466,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2023
1Dale Bone Farms PartnershipWilson, NC 27896$5,607,499
2Bailey Brothers FarmsBailey, NC 27807$5,407,117
3Anderson FarmsTarboro, NC 27886$2,622,851
4Whitehurst Farms PtnsConetoe, NC 27819$2,245,525
5Keel Brothers FarmsRobersonville, NC 27871$2,030,702
6Amd FarmsHobgood, NC 27843$1,921,584
7Vick Family Farms PartnershipWilson, NC 27896$1,883,042
8Harrell And Owens FarmTarboro, NC 27886$1,834,684
9Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$1,583,027
10Battleboro Ag PartnershipBattleboro, NC 27809$1,325,192
11Tommy CastelowCofield, NC 27922$1,279,002
12Lancaster PropertiesStantonsburg, NC 27883$1,228,644
13Battleboro Ag PartnershipBattleboro, NC 27809$1,190,817
14Dunlow And DunlowGaston, NC 27832$1,169,641
15Rock Ridge Farm PartnershipWilson, NC 27893$1,165,673
16D & W FarmsHobgood, NC 27843$1,156,957
17Albemarle Beach Farms IncEdenton, NC 27932$993,277
18Lamm FarmsSims, NC 27880$976,007
19Fresh Pik Produce IncKenly, NC 27542$861,325
20Fisher Farms PartnershipWhitakers, NC 27891$853,840

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag