Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 28,312
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $1,491,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Urquhart Farms Inc | Lewiston Woodville, NC 27849 | $4,535,750 |
| 22 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $4,479,660 |
| 23 | Miller Partnership | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $4,426,448 |
| 24 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $4,369,640 |
| 25 | Brinkley Farms Inc | Aulander, NC 27805 | $4,363,249 |
| 26 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $4,353,510 |
| 27 | Whitehurst Farms Ptns | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $4,165,919 |
| 28 | Evans Brothers Partnership | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $3,943,789 |
| 29 | Byrum Farm Service Center Inc | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $3,874,694 |
| 30 | H & H Farms | Como, NC 27818 | $3,874,120 |
| 31 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,829,474 |
| 32 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $3,809,529 |
| 33 | Mush Island Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $3,755,195 |
| 34 | Griffin Farming Partnership | Lewiston, NC 27849 | $3,753,373 |
| 35 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $3,683,660 |
| 36 | Rest-a-bit Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $3,539,434 |
| 37 | Williford Farms Inc | Windsor, NC 27983 | $3,528,044 |
| 38 | Fisher Farms Partnership | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $3,514,624 |
| 39 | John R Grimes Jr Farms | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $3,314,729 |
| 40 | Flythe Farms | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $3,212,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf