Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 18,791

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $979,254,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
101Hawkeye Acres IncBelhaven, NC 27810$1,611,687
102Bateman Produce Farms IncTyner, NC 27980$1,609,520
103Brown Family Farms IncPink Hill, NC 28572$1,600,128
104Robert K TyndallPink Hill, NC 28572$1,593,478
105Lonnie W CahoonFairfield, NC 27826$1,593,476
106Choice Acres IncHertford, NC 27944$1,592,512
107Earl Dawson Pugh IIIEngelhard, NC 27824$1,566,762
108Edward M WinslowBelvidere, NC 27919$1,560,261
109Hayes FarmEdenton, NC 27932$1,557,086
110J M Parrish & Son IncEdenton, NC 27932$1,551,537
111Ernest C Cartwright JrElizabeth City, NC 27909$1,547,907
112Lewis Whitfield Herring JrLa Grange, NC 28551$1,547,267
113Lester Ray CopelandTyner, NC 27980$1,537,837
114Arrowhead Farms IncElizabeth City, NC 27909$1,537,367
115Johnny M Layton Dba Layton FarmsEdenton, NC 27932$1,537,106
116Everett W LarabeeAhoskie, NC 27910$1,535,622
117Arthur T Hardy JrKinston, NC 28504$1,534,543
118E Carroll JacksonMount Olive, NC 28365$1,534,092
119John E MorganHertford, NC 27944$1,529,187
120Agcarolina Farm Credit **Elizabeth City, NC 27906$1,528,258

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag