Tobacco Transition Payment in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,268
Recipients of Tobacco Transition Payment from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $59,448,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Transition Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $398,235 |
22 | Craven L Register | Clinton, NC 28328 | $384,731 |
23 | John David Edwards | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $382,431 |
24 | Russell F Holland | Clinton, NC 28328 | $375,372 |
25 | Lyle Ray King | Ash, NC 28420 | $370,538 |
26 | O C Jenkins Jr | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $366,346 |
27 | Shannon C Ray | Little River, SC 29566 | $354,756 |
28 | Murphy Smith | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $350,549 |
29 | W D Pope | Wallace, NC 28466 | $350,280 |
30 | G W Norris Farms | Garland, NC 28441 | $345,982 |
31 | M & A Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $335,954 |
32 | James L Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $331,507 |
33 | Jackie Mckeithan | Nakina, NC 28455 | $326,567 |
34 | Hall Brothers Farms Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $325,215 |
35 | Henry D Jenkins | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $320,976 |
36 | Marshall Green | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $316,107 |
37 | Jeffrey C Lee | Benson, NC 27504 | $315,515 |
38 | Triple M Incorporated | Clinton, NC 28328 | $310,774 |
39 | Grissett Brothers | Ocean Isle Beach, NC 28469 | $305,087 |
40 | William Dale Brisson | Dublin, NC 28332 | $298,253 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”