Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 963

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $35,154,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Steven C CoombsClinton, NC 28328$140,662
62Bricklyn W RooksWhiteville, NC 28472$140,275
63Cypress Creek Huckleberry Farms IncGarland, NC 28441$137,579
64Rkk Farms IncClinton, NC 28328$134,398
65Barnhill Products/chester BarnhillIvanhoe, NC 28447$133,862
66Derek J Godwin FarmsDunn, NC 28334$133,372
67Cecelia W HudsonTurkey, NC 28393$131,145
68R S S Farms IncSalemburg, NC 28385$130,530
69Triple M IncorporatedClinton, NC 28328$127,980
70King & King Farms IncAsh, NC 28420$127,820
71Cone's Folly Blueberries IncGreensboro, NC 27405$125,311
72Double R Farms Inc.Whiteville, NC 28472$124,853
73King Farming Enterprises LLCAsh, NC 28420$124,354
74Rooks Farm Service IncBurgaw, NC 28425$123,206
75J Michael HopeClinton, NC 28328$122,432
76Ag 18 IncGarland, NC 28441$119,997
77Joseph A Warren IIISalemburg, NC 28385$119,173
78Carr FarmsClinton, NC 28328$119,109
79Byron FisherWhiteville, NC 28472$113,689
80Rbg Farms LLCClarkton, NC 28433$111,433

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag