Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 148

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $1,402,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
61Douglas F TewDunn, NC 28334$8,913
62Phillip Lee HudsonNewton Grove, NC 28366$8,614
63Franklin Lindsay Farms IncClinton, NC 28328$8,491
64Greg SwainWinnabow, NC 28479$8,050
65Donald M Britt JrBladenboro, NC 28320$7,800
66Milton Russ BarnhillTabor City, NC 28463$7,795
67Warren L MillerTabor City, NC 28463$7,740
68Robert Ervin CarrTurkey, NC 28393$7,728
69Thomas Hampton Bradshaw JrClinton, NC 28328$7,613
70Ernest M OdumClinton, NC 28328$7,604
71Richard K ClemmonsBolivia, NC 28422$7,550
72The Mkjs CorporationElizabethtown, NC 28337$7,388
73Carol M LiardonIrvine, CA 92714$7,353
74Double H Farms IncDunn, NC 28334$6,512
75Doris M BattsMagnolia, NC 28453$6,472
76Carlton B BarefootNewton Grove, NC 28366$6,201
77Raymond Jeffrey SmithGarland, NC 28441$6,080
78Hilton L Monroe SrClarkton, NC 28433$6,069
79Frank GallowayHallsboro, NC 28442$5,997
80Jody W CoombsClinton, NC 28329$5,938

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag