Farm Subsidy information
7th District of North Carolina
(Rep. David Rouzer)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,317
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $28,208,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | La Blanc Vineyard | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $81,433 |
82 | Shannon Joe Ward | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $80,636 |
83 | S & G Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $78,950 |
84 | Barnes Food Company | Garland, NC 28441 | $78,094 |
85 | David Keith Langston | Faison, NC 28341 | $76,837 |
86 | P & J Farming Inc | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $76,093 |
87 | Judy S Enzor | Fair Bluff, NC 28439 | $75,950 |
88 | Steven C Smith | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $75,905 |
89 | N & L Farming LLC | Dunn, NC 28334 | $75,719 |
90 | Brenda R Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $75,446 |
91 | Eka Farms LLC | Hallsboro, NC 28442 | $75,429 |
92 | Ag 18 Inc | Garland, NC 28441 | $74,786 |
93 | Steven C Coombs | Clinton, NC 28328 | $74,393 |
94 | William Mark Stanaland | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $73,722 |
95 | Son Rise Farms LLC | Kelly, NC 28448 | $73,699 |
96 | Cecelia W Hudson | Turkey, NC 28393 | $73,558 |
97 | Hannah Forrest Blueberry LLC | Rose Hill, NC 28458 | $73,083 |
98 | R W Skinner LLC | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $72,632 |
99 | Cms Farming Co Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $71,999 |
100 | William Ray Storms | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $71,793 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”