Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 149
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $294,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Seth Alexander Hair | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $192 |
102 | Nicholas Graham Gooden | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $186 |
103 | Bryan King Farms Inc | Turkey, NC 28393 | $177 |
104 | Scott Wells Farms LLC | Burgaw, NC 28425 | $175 |
105 | Andrew S Naylor | Clinton, NC 28328 | $169 |
106 | James Earl Daniels | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $169 |
107 | Raymond Bost | Burgaw, NC 28425 | $164 |
108 | Carla Peterson Dba Twiddle Dee Fa | Clinton, NC 28328 | $162 |
109 | Stewart W Clement | Clinton, NC 28328 | $161 |
110 | Edgar Jay Fields | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $160 |
111 | Warren Farming Company | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $147 |
112 | Pope & Son Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $137 |
113 | Mcphail Farms Inc | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $134 |
114 | Christopher T Sanderson | Burgaw, NC 28425 | $133 |
115 | Oscar Autry | Elizabethtown, NC 28337 | $130 |
116 | Jcrc Farms, LLC | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $128 |
117 | Danny Joe Pope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $122 |
118 | Bobby B Daughtry | Faison, NC 28341 | $114 |
119 | Frederick Rose Thornton | Faison, NC 28341 | $114 |
120 | Judy Boney | Clinton, NC 28328 | $111 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”