Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 191
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $282,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mary Ann Floyd | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $1,753 |
42 | Peggy Phillips | Lexington, SC 29073 | $1,727 |
43 | Creekfield Farm LLC | Garner, NC 27529 | $1,716 |
44 | Steven C Fields | Tar Heel, NC 28392 | $1,702 |
45 | Charles Douglas Boone | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,667 |
46 | Joseph Simmons | Midland, NC 28107 | $1,664 |
47 | Robin Margaret Robertson | Mt Pleasant, SC 29466 | $1,639 |
48 | Jacqueline F Chesnutt | Rocky Mount, VA 24151 | $1,638 |
49 | Sammy W Giddens | Faison, NC 28341 | $1,554 |
50 | William Timothy Turner | Waxhaw, NC 28173 | $1,545 |
51 | Thetus Faulk | Nakina, NC 28455 | $1,496 |
52 | Leslie Mack Edwards | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,485 |
53 | Thomas E Hales | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $1,483 |
54 | Barry E Todd | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $1,478 |
55 | Jimmy Jordan | Smyrna, GA 30080 | $1,437 |
56 | Norma Walton Jordan | Rocky Mount, NC 27804 | $1,437 |
57 | Martha Jenkins Smith | Cerro Gordo, NC 28430 | $1,408 |
58 | Daniel Jackson Gore | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $1,354 |
59 | Dianne Leigh Sumner | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $1,335 |
60 | Jimmy Wayne Jones | Evergreen, NC 28438 | $1,298 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”