Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 148

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $1,402,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21David L MerrittMagnolia, NC 28453$17,319
22Trent TalbertHampstead, NC 28443$16,878
23M & A Farms IncClinton, NC 28328$16,159
24Gene S West JrNewton Grove, NC 28366$15,883
25Pineland Grain Co IncElizabethtown, NC 28337$15,669
26G&s PartnershipClinton, NC 28328$15,214
27Kenneth W BassNewton Grove, NC 28366$15,153
28Kevin L HobbsFaison, NC 28341$15,000
29Harry J Hart JrBolton, NC 28423$15,000
30John HartBolton, NC 28423$15,000
31Willis Boney SrWallace, NC 28466$14,885
32Donald Ray LongAsh, NC 28420$14,850
33William A ButlerBladenboro, NC 28320$14,740
34Swinging Tail Cattle Co IncEvergreen, NC 28438$14,348
35Marvin D ChanceBladenboro, NC 28320$14,177
36S Kettrell StricklandClinton, NC 28328$13,703
37Henry P Lucas JrTurkey, NC 28393$13,702
38Harvey Kenneth CobleGarland, NC 28441$13,496
39Trinity Wayne TylerClinton, NC 28328$13,264
40Robert Gene WardWinnabow, NC 28479$12,975

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag