Farm Subsidy information
8th District of North Carolina
(Rep. Richard Hudson)
Total Subsidies in 8th District of North Carolina (Rep. Richard Hudson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 115
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 8th District of North Carolina (Rep. Richard Hudson) totaled $801,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Pamela Humphries Hill | Huntersville, NC 28078 | $815 |
62 | Ann S Short | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $767 |
63 | Joseph C Graham Jr | Salisbury, NC 28147 | $739 |
64 | Jonathan A Lane | Concord, NC 28025 | $733 |
65 | Eric Edward Smith | Mt Pleasant, NC 28124 | $648 |
66 | Steven D Earnhardt | Mt Pleasant, NC 28124 | $622 |
67 | Jeremy Burris | Concord, NC 28027 | $610 |
68 | Adam L Shoe | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $605 |
69 | Linda F Mcglamery | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $595 |
70 | James B Roberts Jr Real Estate Development Lp | Midland, NC 28107 | $583 |
71 | Melvin W Deal | Festus, MO 63028 | $580 |
72 | Simpson Family Farms | Monroe, NC 28110 | $564 |
73 | Kevin Kirk | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $510 |
74 | Mark Alan Cline | Concord, NC 28025 | $495 |
75 | Richard E Earnhardt | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $490 |
76 | Curtis Lee Upright | Davidson, NC 28036 | $464 |
77 | Curness P Russell | Midland, NC 28107 | $455 |
78 | Gerald Otis Dry Jr | Concord, NC 28026 | $455 |
79 | Anthony David Kidd | Huntersville, NC 28078 | $450 |
80 | Henry A Pless | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $447 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”