Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 431

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $3,881,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
21Edens FarmsRed Springs, NC 28377$35,162
22Spring Hills Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$34,619
23Milton BaucomMonroe, NC 28110$34,078
24Hagler FarmsLaurinburg, NC 28352$33,423
25Forbis Farms IncLumber Bridge, NC 28357$32,758
26Stonewall Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$30,210
27Jazac Farms LLCFairmont, NC 28340$29,588
28Wilton Shooter & Sns Fms IncRowland, NC 28383$29,268
29Rowland Farms IncRowland, NC 28383$29,094
30Lennis WattsParkton, NC 28371$28,349
31Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co IncRed Springs, NC 28377$27,742
32Gold Hill Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$27,489
33Sinclair Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$26,316
34Juniper Land CoLaurel Hill, NC 28351$26,068
35James Steve AllenPolkton, NC 28135$25,761
36Leslie M McrimmonRowland, NC 28383$25,091
37Rockdale Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$22,148
38Joe D ManisLaurinburg, NC 28352$20,173
39Bryan Hagler Dba Bryan Hagler FarmsLaurinburg, NC 28352$19,904
40Cecil Sikes Farm IncAnsonville, NC 28007$19,867

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag