Farm Subsidy information
9th District of North Carolina
(Open Seat)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 480
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $3,147,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rex A Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $22,028 |
22 | Moore Brothers Ag Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $21,692 |
23 | Pete Lindsay Locklear | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $21,646 |
24 | , | $21,518 | |
25 | , | $20,951 | |
26 | Ronald Strickland | Maxton, NC 28364 | $20,495 |
27 | Carnell Locklear | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $20,094 |
28 | Dwight Mitchell | Rowland, NC 28383 | $19,162 |
29 | Rockdale Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $18,487 |
30 | Henry D Locklear | Maxton, NC 28364 | $18,188 |
31 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $18,113 |
32 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $17,956 |
33 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $17,335 |
34 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $17,041 |
35 | Miles Edwin Mercer Jr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $16,749 |
36 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $16,624 |
37 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $16,456 |
38 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $16,244 |
39 | Sinclair Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $15,734 |
40 | , | $15,486 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”