Crop Disaster Assistance Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 949
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $24,163,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $100,654 |
62 | David W Rouse | Orrum, NC 28369 | $100,585 |
63 | Wendell Russell Locklear | Lumberton, NC 28360 | $98,820 |
64 | Henry H Locklear Jr | Maxton, NC 28364 | $97,590 |
65 | Edison Britt Jr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $97,502 |
66 | Herbert Colon Roberts III | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $93,841 |
67 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $93,816 |
68 | William Curtis Locklear | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $93,608 |
69 | Zeb B Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $93,506 |
70 | Michael L Davis | Rowland, NC 28383 | $90,087 |
71 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $89,316 |
72 | Gary N Powers | Lumberton, NC 28360 | $88,657 |
73 | Hayes Brothers Farms | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $88,282 |
74 | S & S Swine Mgt | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $87,664 |
75 | Andrew L Gibson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $87,259 |
76 | Johnny W Nobles | Lumberton, NC 28359 | $86,557 |
77 | Newton Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $85,710 |
78 | Gregory Canady | Lumberton, NC 28360 | $84,332 |
79 | Cecil Sikes Farm Inc | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $83,718 |
80 | T B Upchurch Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $83,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”