Total Commodity Programs in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 8,405
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $313,360,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James A Cooley Jr | Wagram, NC 28396 | $1,143,822 |
62 | Thomas E Gibson Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $1,139,558 |
63 | Dale Samuel Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $1,121,129 |
64 | Inverleith Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $1,117,405 |
65 | Rufus H Cox Jr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $1,099,927 |
66 | Stone Farms Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $1,093,579 |
67 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $1,089,961 |
68 | Sinclair Corp | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $1,068,300 |
69 | Billy Franklin Lee | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,028,648 |
70 | Edgar M Baker | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,020,582 |
71 | T B Upchurch Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,011,224 |
72 | Roberts Farms | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $997,337 |
73 | Charles E Jackson Jr | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $991,469 |
74 | Ray Allen Bartley | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $982,688 |
75 | Jack Leggette Farms | Rowland, NC 28383 | $978,551 |
76 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $970,489 |
77 | Henry H Locklear Jr | Maxton, NC 28364 | $962,415 |
78 | Monroe Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $961,269 |
79 | Larry Sampson | Rowland, NC 28383 | $961,194 |
80 | John M Buie | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $950,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”