Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,103
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $20,956,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert A Wright | Raeford, NC 28376 | $79,361 |
82 | Danny Walters Farms Inc | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $79,008 |
83 | Danny Walters | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $76,584 |
84 | Dwight Mitchell | Rowland, NC 28383 | $76,310 |
85 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $75,316 |
86 | Richard A Snead | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $75,061 |
87 | Casey B Mcqueen | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $74,170 |
88 | Hendrix Company | Raeford, NC 28376 | $72,584 |
89 | Keith Adcox | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $72,030 |
90 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $70,774 |
91 | Haynes Stone Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $70,498 |
92 | Snead Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $68,229 |
93 | Alfred Davis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $66,937 |
94 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $66,190 |
95 | James Alan Williams | Rowland, NC 28383 | $63,360 |
96 | Jim Rozier | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $62,447 |
97 | Chad Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $57,500 |
98 | James A Cooley Jr | Wagram, NC 28396 | $56,650 |
99 | William Floyd Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $56,380 |
100 | Charles B Roberts | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $56,339 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”