Market Loss Assistance Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,248
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $18,113,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Darwin Leggette | Rowland, NC 28383 | $59,315 |
82 | James W Mcgougan | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $58,733 |
83 | Michael A Mccormick | Rowland, NC 28383 | $58,450 |
84 | A & R Growers Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $58,371 |
85 | Danny Walters | Raeford, NC 28376 | $56,492 |
86 | Warner Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $54,968 |
87 | S & S Swine Mgt | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $54,678 |
88 | Robert L Gibson Estate | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $54,406 |
89 | Ralph P Britt And Sons Inc | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $53,012 |
90 | Samuel E Britt | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $52,812 |
91 | William H Mcintyre Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $52,140 |
92 | Rufus H Cox Jr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $51,199 |
93 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $50,952 |
94 | Smith And Barkley Ptr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $50,452 |
95 | Warner Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $48,730 |
96 | Louie Bodenhamer | Rowland, NC 28383 | $48,558 |
97 | Timothy W Herndon | Parkton, NC 28371 | $48,420 |
98 | James Neil Townsend | Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 | $48,317 |
99 | Forbis Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $48,079 |
100 | Herbert Colon Roberts III | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $47,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”