Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 441
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $2,206,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael H Ivey | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $3,579 |
122 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $3,525 |
123 | Duncan G Malloy III | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $3,335 |
124 | Danny Bullard | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $3,305 |
125 | Roy Wood Jr | Pinehurst, NC 28374 | $3,265 |
126 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $3,237 |
127 | Mcintyre Farm | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $3,198 |
128 | Caroline Shook | Shannon, NC 28386 | $3,188 |
129 | Thomas A Powers Jr | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $3,153 |
130 | James M Powers | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $3,152 |
131 | Virginia C Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $3,061 |
132 | John D Gillis II | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $3,026 |
133 | J C Averitt Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $3,001 |
134 | Robert A Wright Jr | Raeford, NC 28376 | $2,885 |
135 | Carolyn H Mcgougan | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $2,882 |
136 | Livingston-john Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $2,866 |
137 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $2,829 |
138 | Kevin Devon Baucom | Marshville, NC 28103 | $2,820 |
139 | Grant F Andrews | Mount Gilead, NC 27306 | $2,819 |
140 | Hodges Limited Partnership | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $2,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”