Farm Subsidy information
9th District of North Carolina
(Open Seat)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,635
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $383,768,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | L And R Moore Farms Inc | Maxton, NC 28364 | $725,436 |
122 | Thurman Burleson & Sons | Richfield, NC 28137 | $720,600 |
123 | Stephen Dent | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $715,415 |
124 | Ronald Strickland | Maxton, NC 28364 | $712,459 |
125 | Fred B Harris | Raeford, NC 28376 | $711,327 |
126 | Jazac Farms LLC | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $708,353 |
127 | Alwyn Sealey | Orrum, NC 28369 | $703,720 |
128 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $703,077 |
129 | Jackson & Lewis Farms LLC | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $701,051 |
130 | Sinclair Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $700,456 |
131 | A & R Growers Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $700,083 |
132 | Jimmy D Powers | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $688,566 |
133 | Kerry L Bodenhamer | Maxton, NC 28364 | $682,044 |
134 | Carnell Locklear | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $677,146 |
135 | Lynwood Johnson | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $672,858 |
136 | Ryan Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $671,319 |
137 | Robert Lee Wilkins | Shannon, NC 28386 | $667,246 |
138 | Madison Lytch Farms | Maxton, NC 28364 | $664,174 |
139 | Henry Hunter Forbis | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $653,769 |
140 | John Elbert Forbis | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $650,390 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”