Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 475
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $5,468,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $53,527 |
22 | Herbert Colon Roberts III | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $53,084 |
23 | Danny Bullard | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $53,034 |
24 | Jazac Farms LLC | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $52,326 |
25 | Rex A Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $52,058 |
26 | James Carey Brixey Jr | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $52,057 |
27 | Ryan Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $51,966 |
28 | Roberts Farms | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $47,812 |
29 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $47,261 |
30 | Randy Lee Kiker Jr | Monroe, NC 28112 | $44,489 |
31 | Jackson & Lewis Farms LLC | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $42,826 |
32 | Talley Farms Inc | Stanfield, NC 28163 | $42,596 |
33 | Hendrix Company | Raeford, NC 28376 | $39,268 |
34 | Snead Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $39,108 |
35 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $37,451 |
36 | Lee Grady Lowry | Maxton, NC 28364 | $35,022 |
37 | Wilton C Jr And W Charles Shooter | Rowland, NC 28383 | $34,399 |
38 | Monroe Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $34,353 |
39 | Cecil Sikes Farm Inc | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $34,164 |
40 | Louie Bodenhamer | Rowland, NC 28383 | $33,386 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”