Conservation Reserve Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,464

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $18,806,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21The Morgan Co Of Laurel HillLaurel Hill, NC 28351$104,989
22Lockhart Farms LLCChapel Hill, NC 27517$104,880
23Carroll Morgan Edwards DeceasedMarshville, NC 28103$99,881
24Dm Rushing Investments LLCMarshville, NC 28103$94,776
25Edgar A MeachamEllerbe, NC 28338$90,194
26Catherine W UsseryHilton Head Island, SC 29926$89,541
27Mary Virginia McfadyenSouthern Pines, NC 28387$89,439
28Michele B GarrettReidsville, NC 27320$88,284
29N W BeachumAnsonville, NC 28007$85,958
30Mary Virgina Mcfadyen Limited ParRaleigh, NC 27612$84,953
31Lucky Farms LLCCary, NC 27518$80,451
32Charlie H PearceFries, VA 24330$78,342
33Pee Dee Orchards IncLilesville, NC 28091$77,504
34Rocky Pee Dee LLCKannapolis, NC 28082$76,665
35Helen C Liles DeceasedWadesboro, NC 28170$76,182
36Willie H McraeMount Pleasant, SC 29464$74,226
37Jetter W Lewis JrFairmont, NC 28340$72,843
38D Elaine Baker BurrWadesboro, NC 28170$71,802
39Jean C ClanskyMenlo Park, CA 94025$71,054
40Park Road Shopping Center IncCharlotte, NC 28220$68,120

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag