Conservation Reserve Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,497

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $19,476,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21The Morgan Co Of Laurel HillLaurel Hill, NC 28351$104,989
22Lockhart Farms LLCChapel Hill, NC 27517$104,880
23Dm Rushing Investments LLCMarshville, NC 28103$103,166
24Michele B GarrettReidsville, NC 27320$100,556
25Carroll Morgan Edwards DeceasedMarshville, NC 28103$99,881
26Edgar A MeachamEllerbe, NC 28338$90,194
27Catherine W UsseryHilton Head Island, SC 29926$89,541
28Mary Virginia McfadyenSouthern Pines, NC 28387$89,439
29N W BeachumAnsonville, NC 28007$85,958
30Mary Virgina Mcfadyen Limited ParRaleigh, NC 27612$84,953
31Michael P WaltersFairmont, NC 28340$83,803
32Charlie H PearceFries, VA 24330$83,032
33Rocky Pee Dee LLCKannapolis, NC 28082$81,348
34Lucky Farms LLCCary, NC 27518$80,451
35Pee Dee Orchards IncLilesville, NC 28091$79,998
36Helen C Liles DeceasedWadesboro, NC 28170$76,182
37Willie H McraeMount Pleasant, SC 29464$74,226
38Jetter W Lewis JrFairmont, NC 28340$72,843
39D Elaine Baker BurrWadesboro, NC 28170$71,802
40Jean C ClanskyMenlo Park, CA 94025$71,054

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag