Deficiency Payment in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 828
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $1,284,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J D Carmichael Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $12,913 |
22 | Darwin Leggette | Rowland, NC 28383 | $12,482 |
23 | James Neil Townsend | Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 | $12,479 |
24 | Wilton Shooter & Sns Fms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $12,429 |
25 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $12,264 |
26 | P & S Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $11,548 |
27 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $11,339 |
28 | Guy P Mccormick | Rowland, NC 28383 | $10,447 |
29 | Baker Enterprises Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $9,723 |
30 | Mickey Wayne Dawson | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $9,629 |
31 | Carey P Edwards | Polkton, NC 28135 | $9,603 |
32 | Parnell Farms Llp | Parkton, NC 28371 | $9,512 |
33 | Autry Farms LLC | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $9,468 |
34 | Ralph P Britt And Sons Inc | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $9,299 |
35 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $9,113 |
36 | David Michael Rozier | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $8,791 |
37 | Edens & Autry Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $8,550 |
38 | Hector M Watson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $8,420 |
39 | Simpson-lewis Farms Inc | Shannon, NC 28386 | $8,360 |
40 | Hinton Mccall King | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $8,191 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”