Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 678
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $13,659,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $214,998 |
22 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $210,820 |
23 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $200,574 |
24 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $184,473 |
25 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $182,523 |
26 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $175,025 |
27 | Thurman Burleson & Sons | Richfield, NC 28137 | $171,659 |
28 | Sinclair Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $170,052 |
29 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $158,313 |
30 | Henry D Locklear | Maxton, NC 28364 | $143,702 |
31 | Hayes Brothers Farm Inc | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $131,535 |
32 | Monroe Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $127,243 |
33 | Ryan Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $125,395 |
34 | Lacy Ledford Cummings | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $124,543 |
35 | William B Leggett | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $122,663 |
36 | Hendrix Livestock Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $117,621 |
37 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $112,601 |
38 | Kelly Edens Archambault | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $111,980 |
39 | Rowland Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $111,465 |
40 | Hendrix Company | Raeford, NC 28376 | $105,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”