Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 110
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $1,216,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W W Cameron Jr | Raeford, NC 28376 | $18,932 |
22 | Timothy J Eatman | Polkton, NC 28135 | $18,430 |
23 | Kenneth F Floyd Jr | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $18,419 |
24 | Timothy T Stewart | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $18,032 |
25 | Lannie R Allen | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $18,032 |
26 | L Duane Strider | Asheboro, NC 27205 | $18,032 |
27 | Johnny L Martin | Mount Gilead, NC 27306 | $17,592 |
28 | Kevin M Martin | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $16,351 |
29 | P Bryan Wilson | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $16,094 |
30 | Hinton Mccall King | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $15,000 |
31 | H F Price & Sons | Dillon, SC 29536 | $15,000 |
32 | Triple L Farms Inc | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $14,992 |
33 | Hinton Mccall King Jr | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $14,988 |
34 | Donald D Burr | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $14,564 |
35 | Rickie David Dewitt | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $14,455 |
36 | David Dewitt | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $14,349 |
37 | Chris G Dewitt | Ellerbe, NC 28338 | $14,349 |
38 | Geneva B Paxton | Hamlet, NC 28345 | $14,221 |
39 | Jerry Gardner | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $14,091 |
40 | John W Templeton | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $13,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”