Farm Subsidy information
10th District of North Carolina
(Rep. Patrick McHenry)
Total Subsidies in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 189
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry) totaled $3,605,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Piedmont Jerseys LLC | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $8,564 |
62 | Anthony L Holt | Lawsonville, NC 27022 | $8,426 |
63 | Edward Ray Dellinger | Vale, NC 28168 | $8,423 |
64 | James Junior Hicks | Danbury, NC 27016 | $8,274 |
65 | Shore Brothers | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $7,964 |
66 | Barry Dinkins | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $7,583 |
67 | Robert A Wise | Vale, NC 28168 | $7,388 |
68 | Jamie Fulp Clark | Madison, NC 27025 | $7,292 |
69 | Radford Farms | Mount Airy, NC 27030 | $7,283 |
70 | Derek Hemrick | Hamptonville, NC 27020 | $7,055 |
71 | Miss Angels Heavenly Pies, Inc | Mount Airy, NC 27030 | $6,961 |
72 | William F Brandon Jr | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $6,946 |
73 | Brandon Slate | King, NC 27021 | $6,945 |
74 | Jason Hunter | King, NC 27021 | $6,698 |
75 | Terry Gray Pratt | Siloam, NC 27047 | $6,591 |
76 | Eugene A Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $6,460 |
77 | Jesse J Brown | East Bend, NC 27018 | $6,311 |
78 | Marty R Casstevens | Boonville, NC 27011 | $5,546 |
79 | George K Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $5,462 |
80 | William Y Kistler | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $5,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”