Counter Cyclical Program in 11th District of North Carolina (Rep. Mark Meadows), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 405
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 11th District of North Carolina (Rep. Mark Meadows) totaled $510,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Osborne Farm Inc | Clyde, NC 28721 | $7,004 |
22 | Robert T Roquemore | Lakeland, GA 31635 | $6,500 |
23 | Charles F Medford | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $5,751 |
24 | Franklin Anderson | Mars Hill, NC 28754 | $5,309 |
25 | Donald R Smart | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $5,181 |
26 | Parkins Brothers Dairy | Clyde, NC 28721 | $4,832 |
27 | Joseph Tim Smart | Clyde, NC 28721 | $4,755 |
28 | Brannon Farms Inc | Horse Shoe, NC 28742 | $3,704 |
29 | Harmons Dairy | Columbus, NC 28722 | $3,518 |
30 | Harold Cole | Sylva, NC 28779 | $3,283 |
31 | Eastern Band Of Cherokee Indians | Cherokee, NC 28719 | $3,253 |
32 | Pearl Johnson | Murphy, NC 28906 | $3,115 |
33 | Neal J Cabe | Hayesville, NC 28904 | $2,986 |
34 | English Dairy Farm | Marion, NC 28752 | $2,979 |
35 | Riverbend Dairy Farm | Franklin, NC 28734 | $2,868 |
36 | Wells & West Partners | Murphy, NC 28906 | $2,832 |
37 | James R Walker | Old Fort, NC 28762 | $2,722 |
38 | Ronnie J Smith | Hayesville, NC 28904 | $2,592 |
39 | Ralph Myers | Brasstown, NC 28902 | $2,396 |
40 | Christopher J Palmer | Clyde, NC 28721 | $2,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”