Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 283
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $4,126,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | V Hansen Land & Cattle Co | Herman, NE 68029 | $210,913 |
2 | Ritter Livestock LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $181,800 |
3 | , | $164,784 | |
4 | Mitchell A Schweers | Wisner, NE 68791 | $156,522 |
5 | Ritter Feedyards LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $136,839 |
6 | Herman Dinklage Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $130,055 |
7 | Eagle Ridge Feed Lot Inc | Beemer, NE 68716 | $126,037 |
8 | Rick L Sebade | Emerson, NE 68733 | $125,000 |
9 | Brent A Sebade | Emerson, NE 68733 | $125,000 |
10 | Ritter Cattle LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $113,423 |
11 | Emmett D Gyhra Jr | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $111,502 |
12 | Cattle Ridge LLC | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $103,753 |
13 | West Point Custom Feeders LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $98,071 |
14 | Lee R Schmit | Pleasant Dale, NE 68423 | $94,298 |
15 | Wolfe Ranch LLC | Richland, NE 68601 | $81,226 |
16 | Nutritional Advances Inc | Lincoln, NE 68510 | $70,365 |
17 | Sdm Livestock Inc | West Point, NE 68788 | $62,945 |
18 | Roy Ritter | West Point, NE 68788 | $60,309 |
19 | H-ko Land And Cattle Company | David City, NE 68632 | $56,305 |
20 | Paul Joseph Semerad | Dodge, NE 68633 | $53,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>