Total Subsidies in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 16,930

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $1,665,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
221James DalleggeDavid City, NE 68632$1,087,059
222Randal H RinkPender, NE 68047$1,086,785
223Lbj Farms IncHowells, NE 68641$1,083,242
224Joel Bernard PennyDecatur, NE 68020$1,079,616
225Marlon H Hennig Living Revocable TrustBancroft, NE 68004$1,076,273
226Dean NickelsMurray, NE 68409$1,074,796
227John KlementUlysses, NE 68669$1,073,332
228Salestrom IncTekamah, NE 68061$1,071,404
229Ronny E KellyThurston, NE 68062$1,068,784
230Dennis Slaughter - Dennis & Sherry Slaughter Rev TRosalie, NE 68055$1,061,497
231W.h. Feeders, LLCLyons, NE 68038$1,056,722
232Tiffany Kay KrusemarkPender, NE 68047$1,050,861
233Dennis A HeimPlattsmouth, NE 68048$1,050,119
234Ritter Feedyards LLCBeemer, NE 68716$1,049,731
235Randy Von SeggernWisner, NE 68791$1,048,363
236Vindulyn Acres IncPlattsmouth, NE 68048$1,047,720
237Dwane Kenneth Piere And Sheryl Ann Piere RevocableMacy, NE 68039$1,046,727
238Russell J ShonkaSchuyler, NE 68661$1,043,411
239Clark LippsTekamah, NE 68061$1,040,465
240Stoklasa Bros IncClarkson, NE 68629$1,037,334

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag