Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,501
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $9,926,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edward Daniel Rohde | Emerson, NE 68733 | $30,917 |
42 | Jared D. Johnson | Thurston, NE 68062 | $30,526 |
43 | Brian A Guenther | West Point, NE 68788 | $30,098 |
44 | Michael D Albrecht | Thurston, NE 68062 | $29,678 |
45 | Ricky D Wendt | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $29,489 |
46 | Bradley Buhrman | Wisner, NE 68791 | $29,465 |
47 | Stephen A Chatt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $29,430 |
48 | Robert Anthony Chatt | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $29,430 |
49 | Joseph M Heavican | Rogers, NE 68659 | $29,397 |
50 | Lazy J Cattle & Hay LLC | Brainard, NE 68626 | $28,971 |
51 | Joe Prinz | West Point, NE 68788 | $28,894 |
52 | Little Pine Ridge Feed Yard Inc | Bellwood, NE 68624 | $28,776 |
53 | Wayne Sabata | David City, NE 68632 | $28,637 |
54 | Mark Dolezal | Pender, NE 68047 | $28,382 |
55 | Petersen Tekamah Farms Inc | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $28,254 |
56 | Joel Bernard Penny | Decatur, NE 68020 | $28,170 |
57 | Scott Thomas Albrecht | Thurston, NE 68062 | $28,041 |
58 | Steven Fuxa | David City, NE 68632 | $27,485 |
59 | Gerald Gentrup | Wisner, NE 68791 | $27,235 |
60 | Kurtis Eugene Pearson | Craig, NE 68019 | $26,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”