Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,077
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $6,324,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Frank Neesen | David City, NE 68632 | $22,582 |
62 | Raue & Sons LLC | Decatur, NE 68020 | $22,244 |
63 | Ronald L Carson Sr | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $22,185 |
64 | , | $22,081 | |
65 | Buhl Credit Shelter Trust | Carmel, CA 93923 | $21,644 |
66 | Clay & Ivy Buhl Family Trust. | Carmel, CA 93923 | $21,644 |
67 | Gary L Malmberg | Oneill, NE 68763 | $21,518 |
68 | Tenney Farms | Decatur, NE 68020 | $21,096 |
69 | , | $20,630 | |
70 | Mink Agribusiness LLC | Greenwood, NE 68366 | $20,610 |
71 | Wayne Ratkovec | David City, NE 68632 | $20,609 |
72 | Gerald Votava | Columbus, NE 68601 | $20,564 |
73 | John J Healy | Schuyler, NE 68661 | $20,415 |
74 | John Wilson | Craig, NE 68019 | $20,113 |
75 | Sears Family 2005 Trust | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $20,037 |
76 | Lansen Company Inc | Lyons, NE 68038 | $19,790 |
77 | Hgn Farms Partnership | Fort Wayne, IN 46845 | $19,712 |
78 | Jeanette Freel | Plattsmouth, NE 68048 | $19,491 |
79 | Mary Faith Hansen | Lake Zurich, IL 60047 | $19,463 |
80 | Gary Ernesti | Omaha, NE 68135 | $18,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”