Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 799
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $3,126,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Pruess Farms Inc | Craig, NE 68019 | $7,908 |
102 | Alan D Blatny | Brainard, NE 68626 | $7,893 |
103 | Vogler Valley Farms LLC | Louisville, NE 68037 | $7,892 |
104 | Mark Dolezal | Pender, NE 68047 | $7,888 |
105 | Bradley Buhrman | Wisner, NE 68791 | $7,874 |
106 | 3-b Farms Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $7,775 |
107 | Gary L Humlicek | Linwood, NE 68036 | $7,735 |
108 | Nicholas J Jindra | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $7,643 |
109 | Herman Dinklage Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $7,619 |
110 | Mary Ann Ratkovec | David City, NE 68632 | $7,619 |
111 | Jordan Andrew Meister | Bellwood, NE 68624 | $7,613 |
112 | Don S Schlichtemeier | Murray, NE 68409 | $7,563 |
113 | Justin Lee Miller | Newport, NE 68759 | $7,388 |
114 | H & H Ag Ltd | Nehawka, NE 68413 | $7,269 |
115 | Ross Anthony Bacon | Lyons, NE 68038 | $7,186 |
116 | Lane Sabata | David City, NE 68632 | $7,177 |
117 | Michael S Dlouhy | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $7,158 |
118 | Randy Helman | David City, NE 68632 | $7,026 |
119 | Shawn Satorie | Herman, NE 68029 | $6,983 |
120 | Wayne Ratkovec | David City, NE 68632 | $6,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”