Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 574
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $3,337,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | West Point Custom Feeders LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $10,820 |
102 | James D Mueller | Thurston, NE 68062 | $10,756 |
103 | Lyle Soenksen | West Point, NE 68788 | $10,731 |
104 | Kevin Puls | Emerson, NE 68733 | $10,663 |
105 | Flatwater Family Farms Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $10,498 |
106 | William Robert Johnson | Oakland, NE 68045 | $10,345 |
107 | Dan J Brester | Howells, NE 68641 | $10,226 |
108 | Nancy E Athey | Walthill, NE 68067 | $9,929 |
109 | Wolfe Ranch LLC | Richland, NE 68601 | $9,928 |
110 | Legacy Family Farms LLC | West Point, NE 68788 | $9,509 |
111 | Chad Ludwig | Wisner, NE 68791 | $9,475 |
112 | Allen Moravec | David City, NE 68632 | $9,469 |
113 | Christine Ahrens | Murray, NE 68409 | $9,319 |
114 | Shirley Bornemeier | Elmwood, NE 68349 | $9,179 |
115 | Jan Marie Ahrens | Nehawka, NE 68413 | $8,967 |
116 | She And I Farms Two LLC | Gretna, NE 68028 | $8,950 |
117 | Jason R Roth | Pender, NE 68047 | $8,926 |
118 | Glenn D Brabec | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $8,778 |
119 | Jerome J Cech III | Clarkson, NE 68629 | $8,582 |
120 | Michael A Soll | Bancroft, NE 68004 | $8,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”